One possibility: look to see if your campus is having a Three Minutes Thesis competition this term; the first round at U of T is being held on March 22.When I approach a thesis introduction, I start from the assumption that the reader shouldn’t have to wait to hear your guiding problem until they have the full context to that problem.All theses require introductions and literature reviews, but the structure and location of these vary considerably.
W737), gives a good example of what a useful outline looks like.) These three questions can be used to broadly analyse the structure of other people's writing so that you can get an overview of what they have done and how they have organised things.
Another way of analysing your writing and the writing of others is to consider which of the following three "moves" are being made in each paragraph or section of a paragraph (see Paltridge and Starfield, 2007, Ch.
The abstract is a short version of the entire thesis which should answer the following five questions (not necessarily in this order or separately): The most common mistake with abstracts is to write them as though they are just another form of introduction, or perhaps as "advanced advertising" where the writer doesn't want to give too much away.
But think about why you read abstracts and what you hope to get out of them, and ask if you're happy just getting "promotional material" or whether you'd rather get the whole story, including key results, in a nutshell.
Background is necessary to orientate the reader to what you are doing, but it is possible to give too much detail so that the reader starts to wonder why they need to know all of what they are being told.
Writing An Introduction For A Masters Dissertation Walden Dissertations
To simply say that your research will look at ways to deal with power grid instabilities indicates to the reader that you're working on solving a problem, but not why that problem is significant enough to work on.Finally, as a summary of the entire thesis, the abstract is the often the last thing to get finalised, but it shouldn't necessarily be the last thing to get written.If you're drowning in data or literature and feel you're not sure where you're going anymore, writing a "working abstract" might help you to get a "big-picture" view of what you're trying to do and, therefore, help you to get focussed again.Many thesis writers struggle with the need to provide adequate contextualizing detail before being able to give a satisfying account of their problem.Truth be told, this inclination—the feeling that our problem is so complex that any explanation will require extensive background—can be a bit of a graduate student weakness.But if this is the case, then it is important to make it clear to the reader what the point of a long review is! "In order to appreciate the significance of ..., it is first important to consider ...").Provides the rationale for proceeding in the way you did and perhaps for why you have organised things the way you have (e.g.The methods section should explain: One possible structure is an introductory section that provides a justification and explanation of the methodological approach(es) chosen, followed by relevant elements of the classical sub-sections: However, there is a lot of disciplinary variation in the way these things are done, so use the ideas from here to analyse what you see in your discipline.Common problems include (see Paltridge and Starfield (2002), Ch.(Some indicative statistics would be enough to make your point, you wouldn't need masses of statistics.) It might help here to think of your Introduction as being what you would tell an educated friend who wanted to know what your research is all about and why you are doing it, while the Literature Review is for other researchers in the field.It needs to be noted, however, that in some disciplines or areas the Introduction includes the Literature Review, and so can be quite lengthy.