The two methods developed in this paper provide an alternative way to think about political phenomena beyond the dominant covariational and mechanismic approaches in political science research. The paper finds, however, that the competition is generated from mechanisms of misperception, uncertainty and poor signaling of intentions from both countries.
Paper 3 is the first theoretically driven empirical examination of the prototypical case of institutional competition – “U. China-RCEP.” The paper tests the common understanding that TPP and RCEP is a product of the intentional competition between U. The paper thus offers a powerful revision to the current understanding of the TPP-RCEP case and also theoretically arrives at a defensive realist model of unintended institutional competition.
Practical examples may include domestic politics, institutions analysis, and diverse conflicts related to domestic or international issues.
When choosing such topic, it’s necessary to focus not on study object per se, but on method that is implemented for particular political science issue analysis.
With expert checking of grammar, structure, formatting, 24/7 online support, as well as academic sources inclusion, excellent results are guaranteed.
Things that are important for any political science research paper: This study field focuses on empirical approach, including comparative methods.
First, how do we think about the concepts of “power” and “international institutions”?
And, how do states interact with each other in the competition over or with international institutions? Paper 1 deals exclusively with the exercise of building a comprehensive theory of institutional power politics.
And it takes for granted that actors deploy multiple resources and modalities of power in their pursuit of influence.
What binds this diverse research program together is its focus on as the politics of collective mobilization in the context of the struggle for influence among political communities, broadly understood.