It is, so the argument goes, not inhumane or irreverent to assist such patients – particularly if they clearly and repeatedly so request – to bring their lives to an end.
It is, so the argument goes, not inhumane or irreverent to assist such patients – particularly if they clearly and repeatedly so request – to bring their lives to an end.I am personally much more in favour of the pro-PAS and pro-VAE positions, although the arguments against do raise issues that need to be addressed.Tags: Examples Of Qualitative Research Proposals In EducationDisaster Recovery And Business Continuity Plan TemplateAp Lit Poetry Essay HelpFormat Literature ReviewRoyal Commonwealth Essay Competition 2012 WinnersStandard Line Spacing For DissertationKindergarten Monthly Homework CalendarBa AssignmentResearch Paper Enron
The value bestowed on human life in all religious traditions and almost all cultures, such as the prohibition on murder is so pervasive that it is an element of common, and not statutory, law.
Objections from the medical profession to being seen or utilised as “killers” rather than saviours of human life, as well as the sometimes well-founded fear of the possible abuse of physician assisted suicide or voluntary active euthanasia, is a further reason.
Compare that with the situation of a 40-year-old man, a husband and father of three young children, who has embezzled company funds and now has to face the music in court. But, I would argue, it would not be morally right for him to do so, given the dire consequences for his family.
To have a right, does not imply that it is always right to execute that right.
The latter procedure is also referred to as “voluntary active euthanasia” (VAE).
I will not deal with the issue of involuntary euthanasia –where the suffering patient’s life is terminated without their explicit consent -– a procedure which, to my mind, is ethically much more problematic.
However, the moral significance of the distinction between “active” and “passive” euthanasia is increasingly questioned by ethicists.
The reason simply is the credibility of arguing that administering a lethal agent is “active”, but terminating life support (for example switching off a ventilator) is “passive”.
It is hard to deny the right of an 85-year-old with terminal cancer of the pancreas and almost no family and friends left, to commit suicide or ask for assisted death.
In this case, he or she both has the right, and will be in the right if exercising that right.