Cicero was the consummate stylist, the model advocate.
His strengths in the use and manipulation of language were admitted by all, and his weaknesses or defects were few or trifling.
Blair concluded that “no man knew the power and force of words better than Cicero.” Yet even Blair discerned certain weaknesses in Cicero, and he proposed that they amounted to a predilection for show (for “eloquence” in the old terminology), which had the effect of leaving on the minds of both readers and hearers “the impression of a good man, but withal, of a vain man.” Over the years, concepts of appropriate style have changed somewhat, and today “Ciceronian” implies the use of long and elaborate sentences—usually of the periodic form—that end with great force and climax.
The term also suggests parenthetical elements, doubled elements, appositives, such tropes as triads, and periphrasis.
is this universality of application and of appeal which has made cicero's essay .
Dissertation express individuals empedocles theory of union of the elements (friendship) and discord.
the pleasure of enjoying the friendship of a living soul endowed with.
Dissertation droit administratif laelius says this places too much of a restriction on friendship.
These three works have justified placing Cicero in the company of Aristotle and Quintilian as the three great classical writers on the subject of public speaking.
In many ways, Cicero’s is written in three books and is offered as a reconsideration of earlier thoughts and writings on public speaking; it was intended as edification for his brother Quintus, who had inquired about the functions of the orator.